-
Website
http://brian23.com/ -
Original page
http://madpropstobakedpotatoes.com/?p=1730 -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Shadii as Inflatable Ben
1 day ago · 3 comments
-
Writer’s Block :(
3 weeks ago · 24 comments
-
My Family’s Merry Christmas Letter
2 weeks ago · 11 comments
-
Fairly Cool WSM? News
1 week ago · 7 comments
-
Prelude to a Two Gun Girl
2 weeks ago · 11 comments
-
Shadii as Inflatable Ben
also, yes, i agree (a la @ColleenBurns and @TheNoLookPass). i also had friends (IRL) who wanted to start a dating website for foreign citizens to be set up with someone who is a US citizen so then they get married real quick so the other one gets to be a US citizen. my two friends who came up with this idea are British and Irish citizens. turns out it's kind of illegal...
also, while I'm really a fan of social networking sites, I've made connections with fantastic people, some of whom I've met in real life & have become close friends with, & I spend way more time than I should on twitter & facebook, I honestly don't get the Second Life thing. I had to join for a class, & while it was fun going skydiving without the paralyzing fear of heights, that was pretty much all I enjoyed about it. I can't imagine meeting someone there & getting married. though I know it happens. I just can't relate.
... aaaanyway.
xo
You'll also need "internet stalker" since there are millions of those little buggers.
Come to think of it, who says we can't have more than one "internet marriage"?
It works for some cultures (and religions).
And how would an "internet marriage" differ from a real marriage? You'd be physically separated by a few 1000 miles in most cases, so just like a 'real marriage', the sex would be the same. (i.e. in ones head or non-existent). (Am trying to avoid getting into a "virtual relationship" scenario here).
Would "internet marriage" work better than 'real life marriage'?
I certainly know some couples who would actually talk more.
But then the potential for "internet nagging" would be exponentially massive which is a far more scarier thought.
I do suspect dat f I had RitN it n txt spk, U wud hav undRstD it much BetA.
But, holding head down in shame, I did re-read it back myself and it annoyed the buggery out of me too. My bad for typing at 200mph but proof reading at 2.
Consider myself told off, wrists slapped and I'll try harder next time, just for you...
(Now I'm paranoid that my ... will get on your tits too, or damn, will the () do it instead).
Oh what the heck, one more just for you... "Heil Grammatik"